kidgas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 30 
|
Post by kidgas on Feb 13, 2017 19:12:50 GMT
|
|
nerdgas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 145
|
Post by nerdgas on Feb 13, 2017 19:14:38 GMT
Hmmm. I wonder what agreed transfer policy means.....
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 19:17:08 GMT
Hmmm. I wonder what agreed transfer policy means..... Simple, you must always buy our players for a fee and that has just gone up massively. In all seriousness a very odd statement, looks like the reply was written by the same person. City respond after Bristol Rovers confirm they are not pursuing EFL complaint. Bristol City FC welcomes the news that Bristol Rovers have confirmed they will not be pursuing any complaint to the EFL‎ following the transfer of striker Matty Taylor. The decision comes after high-level discussions between the two clubs about an agreed transfer policy going forward. The club will be making no further comment. |
|
nerdgas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 145
|
Post by nerdgas on Feb 13, 2017 19:28:05 GMT
Is it possible that they have agreed no more cross city transfers in the near future?.....
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 19:31:08 GMT
Communication and agreement between the two clubs has to be a positive.
|
|
|
|
Post by DudeLebowski on Feb 13, 2017 19:33:44 GMT
& another healthy cheque signed.
Lovely.
|
|
nerdgas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 145
|
Post by nerdgas on Feb 13, 2017 19:34:13 GMT
Communication and agreement between the two clubs has to be a positive. Agreed. The statement is so vague though that it invites speculation. Not sure that's a positive thing but in the scheme of things not important I guess. |
|
nerdgas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 145
|
Post by nerdgas on Feb 13, 2017 19:34:58 GMT
& another healthy cheque signed. Lovely. I did wonder that. I guess when the accounts come out we'll know if that;s the case. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 19:35:43 GMT
Communication and agreement between the two clubs has to be a positive. Agreed. The statement is so vague though that it invites speculation. Not sure that's a positive thing but in the scheme of things not important I guess. If our owners have withdrawn their objections then we must assume that they are happy with the agreement. That's good enough for me. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 19:46:54 GMT
Agreed. The statement is so vague though that it invites speculation. Not sure that's a positive thing but in the scheme of things not important I guess. If our owners have withdrawn their objections then we must assume that they are happy with the agreement. That's good enough for me. I also like the fact that both clubs have said that is the end of it, rather than having the agreement and keeping quiet. |
|
Angas
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 2,067
|
Post by Angas on Feb 13, 2017 19:48:55 GMT
So it sounds as if something certainly wasn't how it should have been with the MT transfer. Confirms what I always thought about that lot down the road.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 19:58:29 GMT
So it sounds as if something certainly wasn't how it should have been with the MT transfer. Confirms what I always thought about that lot down the road. They had issues with underhand events with the rugby club announced today, perhaps they are making an attempt to keep their noses clean. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 20:00:29 GMT
Agreed. The statement is so vague though that it invites speculation. Not sure that's a positive thing but in the scheme of things not important I guess. If our owners have withdrawn their objections then we must assume that they are happy with the agreement. That's good enough for me. Too generous on this occasion. It's all very nice that we have a gent for an owner, and a well connected one at that, someone who wouldn't want to be seen getting involved in low-grade arguments, but it was his club that issued the statement about the complaint. Am I missing something? |
|
gsdarri
Joined: February 2017
Posts: 2
|
Post by gsdarri on Feb 13, 2017 20:03:51 GMT
So it sounds as if something certainly wasn't how it should have been with the MT transfer. Confirms what I always thought about that lot down the road. Have to agree with you on that one |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 20:15:41 GMT
If our owners have withdrawn their objections then we must assume that they are happy with the agreement. That's good enough for me. Too generous on this occasion. It's all very nice that we have a gent for an owner, and a well connected one at that, someone who wouldn't want to be seen getting involved in low-grade arguments, but it was his club that issued the statement about the complaint. Am I missing something? I assume that the agreement is both financially and commercially beneficial to BRFC otherwise why withdraw the complaint. I thought that I was the one missing things recently. 😉 |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 20:22:15 GMT
Like I said all along. Nothing doing here. Transfer is done so everyone should move on.
I'd focus more on the fraud at BRSC.
|
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 20:28:16 GMT
Like I said all along. Nothing doing here. Transfer is done so everyone should move on. I'd focus more on the fraud at BRSC. Or the cheating at Bristol Sports Rugby Club. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 20:45:27 GMT
Too generous on this occasion. It's all very nice that we have a gent for an owner, and a well connected one at that, someone who wouldn't want to be seen getting involved in low-grade arguments, but it was his club that issued the statement about the complaint. Am I missing something? I assume that the agreement is both financially and commercially beneficial to BRFC otherwise why withdraw the complaint. I thought that I was the one missing things recently. 😉 Having had a cup of tea and 10 mins to reflect, I think it's actually a but humiliating for City. Wael has called them out, made it public knowledge what they have done, then just washed his hands of it and left them holding their ill-gotten gains. |
|
|
|
Post by johnanagram on Feb 13, 2017 21:04:54 GMT
If our owners have withdrawn their objections then we must assume that they are happy with the agreement. That's good enough for me. Too generous on this occasion. It's all very nice that we have a gent for an owner, and a well connected one at that, someone who wouldn't want to be seen getting involved in low-grade arguments, but it was his club that issued the statement about the complaint. Am I missing something? Yes we are no longer run by idiots............. |
|
Deleted
Joined: January 1970
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 13, 2017 21:18:00 GMT
Too generous on this occasion. It's all very nice that we have a gent for an owner, and a well connected one at that, someone who wouldn't want to be seen getting involved in low-grade arguments, but it was his club that issued the statement about the complaint. Am I missing something? Yes we are no longer run by idiots............. People have been grabbed by the collar and wrestled around executive boxes by former Directors for less  |
|
